Criteria for writing reviews: Separating opinions from facts

See whose evaluation it is.

Even with the same product, evaluations will differ depending on whether the user prioritizes photography or ease of storage. When reading reviews, be sure to check how the user intends to use the product and what features they prioritize. It's important not to simply equate opinions that differ from your own use with the overall quality of the product.

Distinguish between facts and expressions

The comment "It's heavier than I expected" is different from knowing what the weight includes. Dimensions, accessories, and the number of days it took to resolve the issue should be checked for any indication of conditions or records. Don't judge solely on strong praise or complaints; read to understand exactly what happened.

Check the posting date and any additional information.

Immediate reviews and reports written after a certain period of monitoring will reveal different information. Product specifications and sales conditions may have been updated, so please check the posting date and the target configuration. If corrections or results of actions have been added later, read them in conjunction with the initial post.

Finding the reasons for the divided opinions

When evaluations differ significantly, review whether the materials, composition, sales channels, and intended use are the same. Don't make a decision based solely on majority vote; check if there is sufficient information on the items that are important to you. You can also avoid assigning scores to posts that are not useful for making a decision, and instead use them as clues for further questions.

Checklist

• I checked the poster's intended use and target configuration.
• I separated specific facts from personal opinions.
• I checked the date, corrections, and the results of the action taken.